Peer review
Urbanism and Architecture Files journal follows a double anonymized review process. The submission will initially be assessed by our editors to determine suitability for publication in this journal. If your submission is deemed suitable, it will typically be sent to a minimum of two reviewers for an independent expert assessment of the scientific quality. The decision as to whether your article is accepted or rejected will be taken by our editors.
Our editors are not involved in making decisions about papers which they have written themselves; have been written by family members or colleagues; relate to products or services in which they have an interest.
Any such submissions will be subject to the journal’s usual procedures and peer review will be handled independently of the editor involved and their research group.
All submissions are conduted by Editorial System which ensures anonymization during peer reviewing.
Steps:
1Submision by Editorial System
2Editorial Assessment: -suitability for publication in journal
–compliance of the manuscript with technical and editorial requirements
-antiplagiarism analysis
3double blind preer review
4-if reviews are positive: corrections accoring to reviewers comments (if necesarry) or
-if reviews are negative: rejection
5 After author’s corrections there is editorial correction
6 Final accteptance